Skip to main content

Will We Ever Separate the Wood from the Stove?


 

I am reminded of an incident from 2005. I had just started my career in rural development in Chhatola, a small village in the famous fruit belt of Ramgarh, Nainital. One morning, a local woman entered the courtyard of our staff quarters and began cutting a few twigs from a tree.

My colleagues—environmentalist and nature-lovers—were deeply hurt. They rushed out to stop her. After a brief confrontation, the frail woman climbed down, muttered a few bitter words, and walked away.

That moment stayed with me. Why did she walk so far for just a few twigs? Didn't she have anything better to do at dawn? What kind of systemic pressure forced her to pick a fight with an organization just for firewood? She knew she would be stopped, yet she came. Why?

Years later, between 2010 and 2020, while working in Mandla (Madhya Pradesh), I saw this scene every single morning. Lines of women carrying heavy head-loads of wood; men carrying split logs in shoulder slings. Despite the launch of the Ujjwala Yojana (LPG scheme), biogas, and smokeless stoves, the number of women carrying wood never seemed to decrease.

The Illusion of Progress: By the Numbers

If we look at the data, the paradox becomes clear:

Survey SourceMetricFirewood/Solid Fuel Usage (%)Est. Population
NSSO (2023)Consumption37% (National)~520 Million
NFHS-5 (2021)Primary Fuel41% (National)~580 Million
CEEW (2025)Total Users (Stacking)54% (National)~750 Million

In the last 30 years, the percentage of dependent households dropped from 65% to about 38%. But because our population has exploded, the absolute number remains stagnant at over 500 million. If you include "fuel stackers"—those who have a gas connection but still burn wood to save money—that number hits nearly 750 million.

The War and the Supply Chain Fallacy

Now, look at these numbers through the lens of the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict. As global supply chains break and LPG prices skyrocket, millions are retreating from gas back to wood.

Our obsession with "modernity" and "technological progress" often ignores a simple truth: these solutions are tethered to fragile global supply chains. They are not permanent cures. We sell dreams of clean gas, but we have no plan for the 550 million people who rely on the forest.

Colonial Forestry vs. Rural Reality

Our forest management doesn't account for human need. Our forests are increasingly filled with invasive shrubs or "high-value" timber that cannot be touched. Our policies make life harder for the very women they claim to help.

Furthermore, our colonial environmental mindset paints these women as criminals. We call them "protectors of the forest" in speeches, but the moment they gather wood for their children's meal, they become "enemies of the forest."

In reality, gathering dry, fallen wood reduces the risk of forest fires (Vandanal). When people are barred from entering forests, dry biomass accumulates, turning forests into tinderboxes during the dry season.

Local Wisdom vs. State Policy

The community’s "common sense" has always outpaced state policy:

  • In Mandla, people turned the invasive Lantana into a primary fuel source.

  • In Rajasthan and Gujarat, Prosopis juliflora (Vilayati Babool) is used for charcoal.

  • Communities know which wood burns best and which trees to preserve.

Yet, government nurseries prioritize timber like Teak or Shisham. They plant species that cattle won’t eat and that don't provide good fuel—like Karanj or Palash—which produce more smoke than heat.

The Tools of the People

Finally, look at the tools. A woman carries a sickle (hansiya) to gather fodder and twigs. A man carries an axe for timber. Have you ever seen a local villager with a chainsaw? No. The chainsaw is the tool of the timber mafia, not the people.

Conclusion: The "firewood problem" isn't a lack of technology; it's a lack of justice and local integration. Until we stop treating rural energy needs as a crime and start managing forests for people—not just for timber—the smoke from the traditional stove will continue to rise.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Participatory Approaches Spark Critical Consciousness? Inside a Village Experiment That Reveals What Development Often Misses**

  (Acknowledgements: Dhwani Lalai, Keertan Baghel, Ramkumar, Dheeresh, Umesh and Rajesh of Foundation for Ecological Security in 2019-20) For decades, “participation” has been one of the most overused—and least understood—words in development. From large donor programmes to grassroots NGOs, everyone claims to involve the community. But does participation really empower people? Or has it become a comfortable ritual that leaves deeper structures untouched? Mahatma Gandhi: Google images Paulo Friere: from shutterstock To answer this, it helps to return to two thinkers who shaped the idea long before it became a development buzzword. Mahatma Gandhi imagined the what of a true democracy—self-governed, self-reliant communities shaping their own futures. Paulo Freire offered the how —dialogue, critical awareness and the courage to question oppression. When put together, they point toward a participatory approach that is not just about including people in projects, but about enabling t...

क्या लोगों की भागीदारी से सच में सोच बदलती है?

  एक गाँव के छोटे से प्रयोग ने क्या दिखाया** (ध्वनि, धीरेश, सुहास, कीर्तन, राजेश, उमेश, रामकुमार और FES की बिछिया टीम को 2019 में किये इस प्रयोग के लिए आभार) विकास की दुनिया में “भागीदारी” शब्द बहुत चलता है। हर संस्था कहती है कि वे लोगों को साथ लेकर काम करती हैं । लेकिन क्या सच में लोगों की भागीदारी से उनकी सोच और हालात बदलते हैं? या यह बस एक औपचारिक तरीका बन गया है, जिसमें असली समस्याएँ वही की वही रहती हैं? इस सवाल को समझने के लिए दो बड़े विचारकों को याद करना जरूरी है—गांधी और पाउलो फ्रेरे। गांधी ने ऐसे समाज की कल्पना की थी जहाँ लोग खुद अपने फैसले लें। उन्होंने इस तरह भागीदारी के "क्या" का उत्तर देने का प्रयास किया। जबकि फ्रेरे ने बताया कि यह "कैसे" होगा—बातचीत करके साथ में सीखने  से, मुद्दों की पैनी समझ बढ़ाने से और सही सवाल पूछने से जिससे शोषक  व्यवस्था  में सुधार किया जा सके । ये दोनों मिलकर बताते हैं कि असली भागीदारी सिर्फ बैठकों में लोगों को बुलाने से ज्यादा है। यह लोगों को यह समझने का मौका देती है कि उनके जीवन पर कौन-सी ताकतें असर डाल रही हैं। पाउलो फ्रेरे...

हिरन और उसका जंगल

           उन्नीस्वी सदी के इंग्लैंड में जब सामुदायिक जमीनों पर बाड़ा बंदी हो रही थी और उन्हें निजी स्वामित्व में सौंपा जा रहा था, उस वक़्त, इंग्लैंड के लोककवियों  ने कॉमन्स पर कई गीत रचे।  "The Goose and the Common" ऐसी ही एक कालजयी रचना है।   कबीर के  दोहों की तरह इस कविता पर भी सबका हक़ है।              The Goose and the Common The law locks up the man or woman.                                                                               Who steals the goose from off the common But leaves the greater villain loose Who steals the common from the goose. The law demands that we atone When we take things we do not own But leaves the lords and ladies fine Who take things that are yours and mine. The p...